The 2010 Medium Files: Did the US Navy Copy a Psychic’s Blueprints

Can anyone explain how the US Navy, starting in 2016, was able to patent the exact same technologies that I had already documented with an official timestamp in early 2010?

Note: All these texts have been translated with a Language Tool, and errors may have occurred during this process.

The Statistical Proof: Coincidence is Physically Excluded

How likely is it that a private individual in 2010 sketches a technology in detail that years later becomes the core secret of the US Navy? In mathematics, there is no room for such "coincidences"—especially not when this "coincidence" occurs twice.

The Double Technological Identity: It is one thing to draw a geometric shape. It is a completely different level to document two independent, highly complex systems years in advance:

The Propulsion System (US Patent 10,144,532 B2, filed 2016).
The High-Temperature Superconductor (US Patent 2019/0058105 A1, filed 2017).

The fact that both key technologies already existed in your private records in early January 2010 deprives the claim of an "independent military new development" of any basis. A double coincidence of this magnitude is statistically impossible.

Strategic Safeguarding: To protect the chain of evidence and the author, the decisive technical parameters of both plans are covered. They serve as an ultimate insurance: an incontrovertible proof of authorship that can be fully activated at any time in the event of a threat or denial. The 2010 timestamps are the physical evidence of a priority that cannot be erased.

The Seamless Documentation History

The proof of priority is based on a chain of events and digital timestamps that date far back before the official patent filings of the US Navy:

The Digital Timestamp (January 2010): Both technological concepts—the propulsion system as well as the energetic heart—were formally secured in January 2010. These documents contain the specific features that only appeared over six years later in the patents of Salvatore Pais (US 10,144,532 B2 and US 2019/0058105 A1).
The External Communication Record (June 2012): Long before the US Navy announced its "revolution," the existence of the plans and the associated incidents were detailed in an email to the scientist Illobrand von Ludwiger (MUFON-CES). This digital correspondence serves as incontrovertible proof that the information was already in the possession of the author in 2012 and was brought to the attention of an expert.
The Strategic Partial Release: The current documentation deliberately shows only the overlaps with the already published patents. The deeper physical level of the 2010 plans remains under seal as protected documentation. This serves as the ultimate proof: only those who possess the original system can verify the covered data if necessary.
The Physical Evidence: Despite several targeted break-ins and manipulations of digital devices in the years 2010, 2011, and 2012, the core of the documentation remained intact. The agreement of the timestamps with the later Navy patents is not a theory, but a physical fact.

If the most powerful military in the world and its elite scientists take years to patent a technology that a private individual without an engineering degree had already seamlessly documented in 2010—who then is the true source of the technological progress of our time?

Disclaimer: This content presents a chronological comparison of private documents from 2010 and public patents from 2016. The mention of Salvatore Pais and the US Navy is for research and documentation purposes only. Any questions regarding the origin of the technology are based on verifiable, time-stamped evidence.